Clear My Claims for Launch

Give Marketing Usable Claims and Give Compliance the Evidence Needed to Evaluate Them

Marketing wants strong claims. Legal/compliance keeps saying no. We need to launch.

A product can be ready to move forward and still get stuck because different teams do not agree on what the science supports.

Fowoyo Scientific Consulting reviews the proposed claims against the available evidence and identifies the strongest scientifically supportable path forward.

Find the strongest usable claims the product can support so marketing and compliance have a practical path forward.

The goal is to help marketing and compliance work from the same evidence so claim disputes do not unnecessarily stall the launch.

Marketing and compliance claim clearance review before a supplement launch

Is This the Problem You Are Facing?

This Service May Be a Fit If

Marketing wants stronger claims but compliance or legal will not approve the current wording

Different teams are interpreting the same research differently

The product is approaching launch and claim disagreements are slowing decisions

You need to know which proposed claims are actually supported by the evidence

Some claims may be usable with different or more qualified wording

You need a working claim matrix that marketing, scientific, regulatory, and compliance teams can review

You want to identify claims that should be dropped before they create a launch or regulatory problem

You need to know which claims require additional support or legal/regulatory review

What We Look At

We Map the Proposed Claims to the Evidence Behind Them

The review asks questions such as:

Does the evidence support the claim as written?

Would different or more qualified wording better match the evidence?

Is the claim relying on ingredient research rather than finished-product evidence?

Does the studied dose match the dose in the product?

Does the research apply to the intended population and benefit?

Are important limitations or evidence gaps being overlooked?

Should the claim be removed because the support is too weak?

Does the claim need additional legal or regulatory review before use?

The purpose is not simply to say yes or no to marketing language. It is to identify the strongest usable claims the evidence can support and show where additional caution, rewriting, or review is needed.

What You Receive

Claim Clearance Package

You receive a working claim matrix showing each proposed claim, the supporting evidence, the recommended decision, and scientifically appropriate alternative wording where available.

Where scientifically appropriate, FSC also identifies alternative wording that more closely matches the evidence.

The package also contains the scientific support behind the recommended claims so marketing, compliance, legal, or regulatory advisers can see the basis for each decision.

Claim reviewed

The exact proposed wording being considered for launch.

Evidence mapped

The scientific support relevant to each proposed claim.

Recommended wording

Alternative or qualified claim language where scientifically appropriate.

Evidence gaps

Missing support or uncertainties that could affect whether the claim should be used.

Claims that should not be used

Claims that go beyond what the available evidence can reasonably support.

Support for review

The scientific basis behind the recommendations for marketing, compliance, and other advisers to evaluate.

Claim Decision

REWRITE

DROP

NEEDS ADDITIONAL SUPPORT

REFER FOR LEGAL/REGULATORY REVIEW

Give marketing usable claims and give compliance the evidence needed to evaluate them—so claim disputes don't unnecessarily stall the launch.

What This Can Help You Avoid

Resolve the Claim Questions Before They Become Launch Problems

Launch delays

Late-stage claim disputes that keep the product or campaign from moving forward.

Repeated rewrites

Multiple rounds of claim changes because teams do not have a shared evidence framework.

Weak or unsupported claims

Using language that goes further than the scientific record can reasonably support.

Marketing-compliance deadlocks

Internal disputes over what can be said when both sides are working from different interpretations.

Preventable regulatory exposure

Claims moving forward without adequate scientific support or the additional review they may require.

When to Use This Service

Use Claim Clearance Before the Launch Clock Becomes the Problem

Before product launch

When proposed claims need scientific clearance before final approval.

Before a campaign

When marketing language needs review before significant advertising spend is committed.

During label or website updates

When existing claims are being changed or strengthened.

When teams cannot agree

When marketing, scientific, regulatory, legal, or compliance teams need a shared evidence-based starting point.

Have Claims Holding Up a Launch?

Send us the proposed claims, product information, and the evidence currently being used to support them.

We will determine the scope of the review and whether Clear My Claims for Launch is the right service for the situation.

Schedule a Consultation →