Scientific Due Diligence

Find the Weaknesses Before the Other Side Does
Prepare for External Scrutiny
We're facing investors, acquirers, retailers, or other outside scrutiny. Will our science hold up?

A strong commercial story can become much harder to defend when an outside party starts asking detailed questions about the science behind the product, formulation, claims, or evidence.

Fowoyo Scientific Consulting examines the scientific story as an outside reviewer might, looking for weaknesses, inconsistencies, evidence gaps, formulation concerns, and questions that could surface during external review.

The goal is to identify scientific vulnerabilities before an investor, acquirer, retailer, buyer, partner, or other reviewer discovers them—and give you time to understand and address what matters.
Independent scientific due diligence review of product evidence and documentation
Is This the Problem You Are Facing?

This Service May Be a Fit If

An investor, acquirer, retailer, buyer, or partner may examine the science behind your product
You want to know what an outside reviewer could question before the review begins
Your commercial story depends on claims, studies, ingredients, or formulation decisions that need closer examination
You are unsure whether your scientific documentation is complete and internally consistent
You need to identify weak or unsupported claims before they become a negotiation problem
You want scientific red flags prioritized so leadership knows what requires attention first
You are considering an investment or acquisition and need an independent scientific view of the target
You want difficult scientific questions identified before someone on the other side asks them
What We Review

We Examine the Scientific Story the Way an Outside Reviewer Might

Are important claims weak, unsupported, or inconsistent with the evidence?
Do the ingredients and formulation have evidence relevant to the intended product?
Are there important evidence gaps or documentation gaps?
Do scientific materials tell a consistent story across claims, studies, product documents, and presentations?
What questions is an outside reviewer likely to raise?
Which issues could affect confidence in the product or scientific story?
Which problems can be corrected or better documented before external review?
Which issues deserve HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW priority?

The purpose is not to make the company look perfect. It is to identify what could weaken the scientific story, understand how important each issue is, and decide what should be addressed before outside scrutiny begins.

What You Receive

Scientific Due Diligence Readiness Report

You receive an independent review of the scientific vulnerabilities that could be raised during external scrutiny.

The report prioritizes the issues and provides recommended corrective actions so you can decide what should be fixed, documented, investigated, or prepared for before the other side begins asking questions.

Red flags

Scientific issues that could materially weaken the story being presented.

Weak or unsupported claims

Claims that may be difficult to defend against the available evidence.

Ingredient and formulation evidence gaps

Questions about whether the scientific record adequately supports the ingredients, forms, doses, or intended product benefits.

Documentation gaps

Missing or incomplete scientific records that may become important during review.

Scientific inconsistencies

Places where claims, evidence, product information, or scientific materials do not tell the same story.

Outside-reviewer questions

Difficult scientific questions an investor, acquirer, retailer, buyer, partner, or other reviewer may raise.

Recommended corrective actions

Practical steps to address, document, investigate, or prepare for identified issues.

Issue priorities

A clear indication of which findings deserve the most immediate attention.

Issue Priority
HIGH
MEDIUM
LOW
Find the weaknesses before the other side does.
Two Ways to Use This Service

Preparing Your Company or Evaluating Another One

Company-Side Readiness

For companies preparing for investor, acquirer, retailer, buyer, partner, or other external scrutiny. FSC identifies vulnerabilities before the outside review so the company can prepare and address important issues.

Investor or Acquirer-Side Evaluation

For a party considering a transaction, FSC can independently evaluate the target's scientific story, evidence, formulation, claims, and identified gaps. This engagement may be delivered as an Independent Scientific Due Diligence Report.

What This Can Help You Avoid

Do Not Let the Other Side Discover the Problem First

Late scientific surprises

Important weaknesses appearing only after external review has already begun.

Loss of confidence

Outside parties questioning the broader scientific story because important gaps were not identified early.

Negotiation problems

Scientific weaknesses becoming leverage for the other side during a high-stakes discussion.

Unprepared answers

Leadership being surprised by questions that could have been anticipated beforehand.

Preventable delays

Documentation or evidence issues slowing a review because they were discovered too late.

When to Use This Service

Review the Science Before the Stakes Get Higher

Before fundraising

When investors may examine the scientific basis behind the product or company story.

Before acquisition or partnership discussions

When scientific weaknesses could surface during a transaction or strategic review.

Before retailer or buyer review

When an outside commercial party may scrutinize claims, evidence, ingredients, or documentation.

When evaluating a target

When an investor or acquirer needs an independent scientific assessment before making a decision.

Facing Outside Scrutiny?

Tell us what review, transaction, retailer discussion, investment decision, or other external scrutiny you are preparing for.

We will determine the scope of the scientific review and whether Scientific Due Diligence is the right service for the situation.

Schedule a Consultation →